Please forgive the geeky title of this blog post. I can't help myself. I have too many geeky interests.
Anyways, one species that I have really wanted to see since moving here is the Scarlet Kingsnake (Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides). It's a beautiful little snake...the adults usually range from 14-27 inches long (Beane et al. 2010). It's non-venomous, and a predator of primarily cold-blooded vertebrates. In this region, the Scarlet Kingsnake is mostly fond of lizards, particularly skinks (Palmer and Braswell 1995). Despite it's stunning colors, it is very secretive and difficult to find....so we were faced with a challenge!
On the first day of our Sandhills trip, we spent alittle time with a Herpetology Class that was having a field trip in the same area. Early in the morning, someone came across a nice little Scarlet Kingsnake. It was very cool to see one.....but would have been more cool to find it ourselves. So, after some time of hanging around with the class, we broke off for a spell.
Luckily...as with the Copperheads...Jeff knew where to go and also some tricks about the microhabitat to focus on when searching. Finding them is not just about being in the right habitat at the right time of year....it's also about finding fallen logs and peeling back the bark (not even just rolling the logs themselves, but peeling back the bark!). These little guys like to hide there, just below the bark layer, absorbing the warmth.
It should be noted that, these types of searches can be very destructive to the small habitats and micro-climates required by many of the critters living among fallen woody debris. So, I would recommend doing this very sparingly, if at all. I would also suggest taking all effort NOT to destroy the bark you peel off, so it can be carefully put back. The average "herper", just going out there and tearing stuff up in an effort to see things and get pictures, can be very destructive. The impact of destructive practices when "herping" has been found to be substantial, in some cases. In fact, Goode et al. (2004) found a correlation between rock outcroppings damaged by collectors and fewer reptiles present. Such disturbances do not need to be dramatic. Pike et al. (2010) found that even rocks displaced less than 30 cm supported fewer lizards than undisturbed rocks.
To be responsible, you have to at least try and leave as little evidence of your presence as possible.
But anyways....on to the kingsnakes. We had been out for an hour or so looking among the fallen logs, under pieces of tin, and below the bark on fallen logs/trees amongst the wiregrass. Having fun, but not much luck with Scarlet Kings. I did happen across a Racer (Coluber constrictor) in the "blue" or "opaque" phase that occurs just prior to the snake shedding its skin. Got a neat shot of his tongue.
Finally, however, our luck changed!
Ed was nice enough to drive the group of us around to a variety of spots. Thus, we were able to hit a site for a period, then hop back in the vehicle as a group and move on to the next site en masse. At our final location, we saw alot of fallen woody debris that looked promising. We got to work. At one point, Jeff peeled back some bark on a dead, but still standing upright, pine tree and a little Southern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys volans) that had been hiding beneath bounded up the tree and into a hole. Didn't get a picture of it, though!
Later, I peeled back the bark on an old fallen long-leaf pine trunk, and immediately was struck by the dazzling color pattern of a beautiful little snake beneath!
Next, Jeff peeled back some of the bark alittle further down on the same log and turned up another!!
Together they made quite a pair....
Because we had finally seen a Scarlet Kingsnake, we stopped searching for them to avoid damaging more potential micro-habitat in the area.
Great variation exists in the appearances of Lampropeltis triangulum (generically referred to as the "Milksnake"). The Scarlet Kingsnake (Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides) is the only subspecies found in our particular state. In other regions of North America, other subspecies are present. There are currently nine sub-species recognized by Crother et al. (2008).
- Louisiana Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum amaura)
- Mexican Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum annulata)
- New Mexico Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum celaenops)
- Scarlet Kingsnake (Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides)
- Central Plains Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum gentilis)
- Pale Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum multistriata)
- Red Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum syspila)
- Utah Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum taylori)
- Eastern Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum triangulum).
Beane, J., A.L. Braswell, J.C. Mitchell, W.M. Palmer, and J.R. Harrison III. 2010. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia (second edition). University of North Carolina Press (Chapel Hill, NC).
Crother, B. I. (ed.) 2008. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico (6th Edition). pp. 1-84, SSAR Herpetological Circular No. 37.
Gibbons, W., and M. Dorcas. 2005. Snakes of the Southeast. The University of Georgia Press.
Goode, M. J., D. E. Swann, and C. R. Schwalbe. 2004. Effects of destructive collecting practices on reptiles: a field experiment. Journal of Wildlife Management. 68:429-434.
Palmer, W.M. and A.L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (NC).
Pike, D.A., B.M. Croak, J.K. Webb, and R. Shine. 2010. Subtle-but easily reversible-anthropogenic disturbance seriously degrades habitat quality for rock-dwelling reptiles. Animal Conservation 13:411-418.